Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Education and Urban Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Thompson, F. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Affirmative Action and Social Policy Views of a Select Group of White Male Private High School Students

Franklin T. Thompson

University of Nebraska at Omaha, fthompson{at}mail.unomaha.edu

This study investigates race views of students from a Midwestern, predominantly White, all-male high school. Findings corroborate a belief that students at the pre-sophomore college level lack a proper understanding of affirmative action (AA). Forty-three percent (n = 266) lacked knowledge altogether, whereas 30% (n = 188) opposed AA as a job hiring and promotion (out-come) measure. Conversely, a majority of students (n = 394, 65%) supported AA as an academic scholarship (front-end) measure, compared to those opposed (n = 188, 30%). When using a .05 alpha criterion, significant differences were shown for relationships between (a) job-hiring AA and age of student, grade average, and four selected social policy variables, and (b) academic scholarship AA and five of the social welfare indices. Five of the eleven relationships disappeared, however, when a stricter .01 rule was applied. In spite of the school's elitist reputation, students were supportive of multicultural education, adding credence to the argument that blatant racism is not the only factor that drives the antiracial preference movement.

Key Words: affirmative action • racial preference • merit-based scholarships • Black president • multiculturalism and suburban schools

Education and Urban Society, Vol. 36, No. 1, 16-43 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/0013124503256940


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?