Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Education and Urban Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Berkowitz, E.
Right arrow Articles by Cicchelli, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Metacognitive Strategy Use in Reading of Gifted High Achieving and Gifted Underachieving Middle School Students in New York City

Esther Berkowitz

New York City Public School District

Terry Cicchelli

Fordham University

High achieving and underachieving gifted New York City adolescent students were compared in their use of metacognitive reading strategies. A stratified sample was used to identify extreme groups of achievers, 5 consistent high achievers and 5 consistent underachievers. Data were collected from three sources: (a) the Metacognitive Awareness of Reading Strategies Inventory (MARSI; Mokhtari & Reichard, 2002), (b) think-aloud protocols, and (c) interviews. While no significant differences were noted, frequency of strategy use, particularly in monitoring, made clear that the gifted high achievers were more homogeneous and the gifted underachievers were more heterogeneous strategy users. Further research on metacognitive reading strategy use of high and underachieving gifted middle school students may include the following: (a) using a multidimensional perspective to identify gifted urban students, and (b) examining metacognitive reading strategy use in other academic content areas related to students’ interest. Optimistically, this research should be encouraged in working with urban adolescent students.

Key Words: high achieving • underachieving • gifted

Education and Urban Society, Vol. 37, No. 1, 37-57 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/0013124504268072


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?